We all want children to grow up healthy and safe, but the real world is fraught with problems. These days, there are many news stories of adults having sex with or maliciously raping children. Then you learn reports of sex offender tracking lists that show there are many men living throughout cities and towns, possibly one or two in your neighborhood who are on the sex offender registry. It’s very scary. Many of those lists don’t tell you the context or type of crime they were charged with. Did the perp rape a full grown woman, molest his own children, or molest someone else’s children? How many times did he commit these crimes? How long ago? Was it planned, impulse, or crime of opportunity? If you had this knowledge, you could draw your own conclusions about how safe you and your children are.
—
Female Predators: We know that men are more likely than women to molest children, because females tend to have greater inhibitory controls than males and are more responsive to influences such as shame from society. As a male who has had sexual fantasies about teachers while growing up, I have to question whether we should treat male and female adults equal under the law with regard to having sex with kids. Women are less dangerous than men to kids. Have you have heard of a woman who violently raped a kid? No, they would use persuasion instead. Actually, male kids don’t need a lot of persuasion to act. In fact, some male kids even try to persuade their female teachers through active flirting. At most, in my opinion, female teachers should be punished for breaking the student-teacher relationship (barrier) because of the obvious conflict of interest and breaking the trust of the students’ parents. The remainder of this post will be mainly about male perps.
—
Sexual History: As Adam Corolla points out, there were crooners singing about deflowering sixteen year old girls in the 70s and 80s, and no one thought it was a big deal. What’s changed since then? Now that we give education and careers higher importance, and knowing that having children usually impedes a woman’s career goals, we highly discourage them from having sex so they don’t get pregnant. Christian conservatives have become more active in discouraging everyone from having sex outside of marriage, but they especially focus on kids since conservatives have more influence over concerned parents. What conservatives don’t want to acknowledge is that sex is a natural instinct driven by hormones, and evolution has primed us to have sex while in our teens because the human life expectancy was much shorter (at about 25 years old) a long time ago.

It’s easy to dream that a few generations ago, there were barely any child rapes and molestations. I think that there were actually greater rates of rape and molestations in the past than now since the victims were too afraid or shamed to report the crime, if it was considered a crime. But back then, it was hidden and unreported. Fortunately, we now encourage kids to come forward and report sexual abuse, thus there are many more reports of abuse happening. Knowing that kids are more likely to report abuse probably discourages more adults from molesting children. On the other hand, other influences could likely increase sexual desire and impulsiveness, such as: greater access to pornography, more revealing attire on teen girls, openly and non-punished sexual harassment from male teens, public displays of affection, more talk about sex and peer pressure amongst teens, and teens who play songs with sexual innuendo. In my opinion, sexual harassment by teens should be considered a punishable misdemeanor offense so that it will be strongly discouraged. The other influences are protected by free speech to a degree. Private schools have a great advantage over public schools since they can more easily set restrictions on free speech for kids.

Parents have become more protective of their children after reading horror stories in the news and realizing there is more peer sexual pressure for kids these days. It’s easy to blame the media’s influence for increased sexual pressure, but I think it has more to do with school structure and policy where teachers are in the minority and punishments are restricted. Teachers have much less moral influence over kids, and the wild kids have more influence other kids It’s the blind leading the blind. Another issue we have is parents who infantilize and over-protect kids because they saw something horrible in the news. Studies show that kids who are given more responsibility tend to be more responsible and make better judgments than other kids when their parents aren’t their to watch over them. Parents need to start treating their teens as young adults instead of pretending their children will remain forever young and naive. On the other hand, parents also need to be more restrictive about what their kids wear, because what they wear gives non-verbal signals to other kids about how they can be influenced. Don’t allow your kid to dress like a hood rat or slut. Parents should talk to their kids about sex before someone else does, and preaching abstinence-only is just a plain fantasy of hope that nothing will ever happen.
—
Real Dangers: It’s great that we have laws and punishment to protect children from child rapists. Unfortunately, child rapists tend to have brains that are wired somewhat differently. They are sexually motivated to seek children, and they can’t seem to control those impulses very well. We have harsh punishments to discourage them, but these laws don’t seem to have a great affect on those sexual predators. What’s worse is that harsh punishments give the sexual predator a greater incentive to murder the child they’ve just raped. Otherwise, the child could report the rapist to authorities. If the child is murdered, there’s a greater possibility that the rapist could get away with the crime. Here’s a tough ethical social policy dilemma: Should we have less harsh punishments that may increase child rapes but decrease murders, or should we keep the harsh punishments that may decrease child rapes but increase murders? After a person is recorded in public as a sexual predator for children, their life is over (difficulty with community, finding a job, etc.). In weighing proper punishments, I think most people would agree that rape should be less punishable than for murder. I favor castration for rapists, but that’s considered cruel and unusual punishment. If the predator’s life is over with, then punishment for murder doesn’t seem much worse, so to them murder may be considered an acceptable risk.
—
Hope and Ethical Concerns: This is one of the main issues that makes us willing to compromise ethical concerns over human rights and rights to privacy. Instead of forcefully performing surgical actions upon a convicted criminal to correct their behavior, we can give the criminal option(s) for reduced punishment. Not only should castration be an option, but also neural manipulation of their brains. Since we know their brains are wired differently, it may one day be possible to suppress their sexual motivations for children. Like in the movie, ‘Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind’, scientists have now found a way to suppress memories for victims of post-traumatic stress syndrome.

So why stop there? This brings up so many possibilities, both incredibly good and bad. Is it a slippery slope to publicly accepted mind-control and repression of culture? There doesn’t exist yet any ethical guidelines for the use of this technology, and from what we’ve seen in other countries like China and Burma, they don’t care about ethics, so they might start using this kind of technology in the future to control their populations whether we ban the use of this technology or not. It was fifty years ago in the USA that free speech was constantly violated by local, state, and the federal government. Christian conservatives want to go back to that supposed idyllic time and push their religious beliefs on the rest of us. They would most likely be the ones in the USA who would want use this technology to brainwash society. Our constitutional right to free speech and privacy should protect our society from forceful use of this technology, so that may give us hope that government cannot use this technology on people without consent. It should be an option for convicted sexual predators (and those who confess their motivations before they have acted on them) to allow this technology to be used on them and re-wire their sexual motivations.

It would be nice if this technology was protected by the US secret munitions laws to prevent this technology from being spread throughout the world, but the technology is probably already available. We don’t have a complete map of the human brain yet, but university labs are on their way to building that map. People have less human rights and constitutionally protected rights in other parts of the world, but hopefully that will change in time.

Recent Entries

• The Web of Life
• Sex Offender Punishment Delimmas
• Scientific Critique of ‘I Am Legend’

This entry was posted on Saturday, December 29th, 2007 at 10:27 am and is filed under Society. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.